> That is literally what my post said I don't follow that at all. The post of yours that I responded to suggested that the scrapers could "just add an LLM" to

> That is literally what my post said I don't follow that at all. The post of yours that I responded to suggested that the scrapers could "just add an LLM" to get around the protection offered by TFA; my post explained why that would probably be too costly to be effective. I didn't downvote your post, but mine has been upvoted a few times, suggesting that this is how most people have interpreted our two posts. > it can learn which pages are real and “punish” the site by requesting them more Scrapers have zero reason to waste their own resources doing this.