4 ms·
FWIW, I do recall hearing that Trump ran with the announcement ahead of RFK's plan, so it's a good possibility that it got over-hyped. But, the question was wh
by zdragnar 1y ago
FWIW, I do recall hearing that Trump ran with the announcement ahead of RFK's plan, so it's a good possibility that it got over-hyped.
But, the question was why is RFK involved? The answer, it appears, is that he is putting the blame on the government - including the FDA - for not doing its job to regulate industry. Food should contain food. Europe understands this, but America has been a little slow to catch on.
> the guidelines are updated based on best available science
This has almost never been true, given that the available science has long been funded by the ag and food industry. The most recent updates are good for policy documents, but worthless for the average person. He's been promoting a simplified version.
> If you'd actually listen to doctors and researchers, rather than what your echo chamber claims
Actually, that claim has been thrown around, by both doctors in the public arena as well as the government, especially in tandem with the phrase "when used as directed".
All in all, I'm mostly interested to see if there's any actual evidence that comes out from discovery, or if this is all just a big PR stunt by the Texas AG.