3 ms·
As a Green Line enjoyer, I'm not enough of an expert to spot the factual errors. The article does seem a bit much though. I've noticed a lot of the Grokipedia a
by qingcharles 1y ago
As a Green Line enjoyer, I'm not enough of an expert to spot the factual errors. The article does seem a bit much though. I've noticed a lot of the Grokipedia articles just go on. If I wanted to know that much about the Green Line I could probably just buy a book on it.
- cozzyd 1y agoAmong the more obvious errors are short runs to UIC/Halsted and a northwestern trajectory along Lake St from the loop. But yes, it also suffers from attention to irrelevant detail.
- cozzyd 1y agoKeeping with the Green theme the page on Green's Functions (https://grokipedia.com/page/Green's_function https://grokipedia.com/page/Green's_function) sounds like it's having a stroke
- 113 1y agoThe problem I have with most AI output like this is that it's just a huge wall of text that doesn't really say anything.
- TYPE_FASTER 1y agoWhile ChatGPT tells me it's unable to access the linked page directly from Grokipedia (lolol), I was able to download the content, copy/paste it into ChatGPT, and ask it to fact check it. I think I will do this more often, with other sites (and other models) as well, going forward, as Chat is able to categorize statements as being correct vs. misleading vs. flat out wrong. > The article does seem a bit much though. I've noticed a lot of the Grokipedia articles just go on. And yes, that's what I'm noticing as well. There is a clear attempt to establish a narrative.