3 ms·

So they can just introduce ads in ChatGPT responses, make $100 billion, and call that AGI?

• vntok 1y ago
  No. When you're thinking about questions like these, it is useful to remember that multiple (probably dozens) professional A-grade lawyers have been paid considerable sums of actual money, by both sides, to think about possible loopholes and fix them.
  • yahoozoo 1y ago
    What would you consider valid methods of generating $100 billion? Enough Max/Pro subscribers?
    • vntok 1y ago
      No. "Pro" subscriptions have nothing to do with AGI, my pet GPS tracker sells those. We're talking about things that would make AGI recognizable as AGI, in the "I know it when I see it" sense. So things we think about when the word AGI comes up: AI-driven commercial entity selling AI-designed services or products, AI-driven portfolio manager trading AI-selected stocks, AI-made movie going at the boxoffice, AI-made videogame selling loads, AI-won tournament prizes at computationally difficult games that the AI somehow autonomously chose to take part in, etc. Most probably a combination of these and more.
• hylaride 1y ago
  Don't worry, it'll be relevant ads, just like google. You're going to love when code output is for proprietary libraries and databases and getting things the way you want will involve annoying levels of "clarification" that'll be harder and harder to use. I kind of meant this as a joke as I typed this, but by the end almost wanted to quit the tech industry all together.
  • vntok 1y ago
    Just download a few SOTA (free) open-weights models well ahead of that moment and either run them from inside your living-room or store them onto a (cheap) 2TB external hard drive until consumer compute makes it affordable to run them from your living room.