Ironic that you refer to the guidelines. The first paragraph of said guidelines reads: What to Submit On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find int

Ironic that you refer to the guidelines. The first paragraph of said guidelines reads: What to Submit On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity. And yet, the original submission was just another version of the trope I used AI to boost my productivity 10 fold, and it was all roses and butterflies. After the n-th iteration of the same self-congratulating, hype-pushing, AI-generated drivel, the point can be made that the original submission does not meet the HN guidelines. To quote Jimmy in South-Park: it's an ad.