9 ms·
> equilibrium strategy is guaranteed to not lose, In my scenario and tournament play. Are you sure? I would be shocked to learn that there is a Nash equilibri
by nabla9 1y ago
> equilibrium strategy is guaranteed to not lose,
In my scenario and tournament play. Are you sure?
I would be shocked to learn that there is a Nash equilibrium in multi-player setting, or any kind of strategic stability.
- michalsustr 1y agoIn multi-player you don't have guarantees, but it tends to work well anyway: https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.aay2400 https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.aay2400
- nabla9 1y agoThanks. > with five copies of Pluribus playing against one professional Although this configuration is designed to water down the difficulty in multi-player setting. Pluribus against 2 professionals and 3 randos would better test. Two pros would take turns taking money from the 3 randos and Pluribus would be left behind and confused if it could not read the table.