3 ms·
I'm not taking a stance, I just want to point out that the previous grant system (the "dei" one) could very easily and justifiably be seen as "imposing onerous
by chermi 1y ago
I'm not taking a stance, I just want to point out that the previous grant system (the "dei" one) could very easily and justifiably be seen as "imposing onerous political terms" on funding as well. You could say the pendulum motion has too large an amplitude.
- insane_dreamer 1y agoit never had a claw back clause -- that is the real problem here. And we've seen that the Trump admin is willing to actually claw back granted funds. not at all the same