3 ms·
That is not the problematic part of the grant conditions.
by henearkr 1y ago
That is not the problematic part of the grant conditions.
- charcircuit 1y agoThe following antidiscrimination laws part was the part quoted in the article linked here. The part they said was recently added. What part are you referring to?
- henearkr 1y agoNope, you cherry-picked around the part where they say no to DEI.
- charcircuit 1y agoYou misread it. It says no to DEI, that violates nondiscrimination laws.
- henearkr 1y agoIt includes "DEI, that violates nondiscrimination laws" presented as an accepted fact. So that includes a statement that is opinionated and political, not based on facts or rationality, and roughly half the US population at least does not agree with it. So, besides how dishonest your comment may be, at least all the readers (who somehow missed that unmissable point, but I digress) get the idea. Edit: the presence of the comma forbids any interpretation as "{follows DEI} AND {violates nondiscrimination laws}", and instead it reads as "{follows DEI} AND {by the way you already know/agree that DEI violates nondiscrimination laws}". Which any project leader that doesn't believe that DEI violates nondiscrimination laws will reject instantaneously. But I have the sense that you are not discussing in good faith anyway, so...