4 ms·
He is not wrong, but we demand superhuman performance from our machines which in this case necessitates superhuman sensory abilities. Current evidence shows tha
by TrainedMonkey 11mo ago
He is not wrong, but we demand superhuman performance from our machines which in this case necessitates superhuman sensory abilities. Current evidence shows that having non-vision sensors is a faster way to create a reliable system. I would personally choose to ride in an autonomous vehicle with Lidars.
- Gigachad 11mo agoIt seems quite likely that once self driving cars are well perfected, we will demand more than just human level driving which is currently horrendously dangerous. If lidar systems can exceed vision only, we are going to demand it as a baseline standard.
- dbt00 11mo ago> He is not wrong, but we demand superhuman performance from our machines I have a model 3 with v3 FSD hardware. FSD is an objectively terrible driver compared to the average human.
- ramraj07 11mo agoAnd if the US government operated with 10% of the agency or spine it ought to operate with, the entire feature would be banned and tesla fined for costing so many lives already. And the cyber truck wouldn't be coasting the roads with no safety sense whatsoever.
- UltraSane 11mo agoHe is very obviously wrong since Waymo cars drive millions of trips with 0 drivers while every single robotaxi still has a safety driver in it at all times.
- CamperBob2 11mo ago"He is not wrong, but anyway, here's why he's wrong." He's wrong. Cameras are not enough... but they're certainly cheap enough.