Reviews are a great way for both reviewer and code author to learn, not just to check for correctness. If it were only that, the reviewer could probably go thro

Reviews are a great way for both reviewer and code author to learn, not just to check for correctness. If it were only that, the reviewer could probably go through the codebase and fix it faster (if it needed fixing). Critically, both should understand that it's the code under review, not the author of the code, to avoid defense-mode and frame discussion as "here's a problem, here's one solution, let's see if we can do better together".