40 ms·

There are multiple people claiming this in this thread, but with no more than a "it doesn't work stop". Would be great to hear some concrete information.

• nl 11mo ago
  Here you go: https://chatgpt.com/share/68ff4a65-ead4-8005-bdf4-62d70b540652 https://chatgpt.com/share/68ff4a65-ead4-8005-bdf4-62d70b5406...
  • 63stack 11mo ago
    I think OP is claiming that if enough people are using these obfuscators, the training data will be poisoned. The LLM being able to translate it right now is not a proof that this won't work, since it has enough "clean" data to compare against.
    • nl 11mo ago
      If enough people are doing that then venacular English has changed to be like that. And it still isn't a problem for LLMs. There is sufficient history for it to learn on, and in any case low resource language learning shows them better than humans at learning language patterns. If it follows an approximate grammar then an LLM will learn from it.
      • 63stack 11mo ago
        I don't mean people actually conversing like this on the internet, but using programs like what is in the article to feed it to the bots only.
        • nl 11mo ago
          This is exactly like those search engine traps people implemented in the late 90s and is roughly as effective. But sure.
• michaelcampbell 11mo ago
  Was saying this 3x in this thread necessary?
  • hasa 11mo ago
    I thought it was a bot
  • 63stack 11mo ago
    I'm just interested in opinions from all 3