3 ms·
I don't get it, can't you just use yaml instead of inventing another DSL.
by meander_water 1y ago
I don't get it, can't you just use yaml instead of inventing another DSL.
- mhosayny 1y agoIt's more compact than YAML. More like a combination of YAML and CSV.
- jscheel 1y agoFor repeating objects of the same structure, yaml will still require each key on each object, whereas this is a hybrid with csv, so it defines the keys once.
- 3cats-in-a-coat 1y agoNo one forces us to use objects in JSON with repeated keys you know.
- makapuf 1y agoIndeed a {"header": ["some","column","names"], "values": [[1,2,3],[4,5,6],...]} could fit.
- arjun-kannan 1y ago[dead]
- jscheel 1y agoFor sure, but most people aren't thinking intentionally about what they are dumping into their context either ;)
- inopinatus 1y agoNorway.
- dragonwriter 1y agoYAML 1.2 has been out for 16 years now, so I would simply not assume that the suggestion to use YAML for a new purpose means “use YAML 1.1”.
- inopinatus 1y agoI could agree that you would not make poor assumptions. Your LLM, however, may experience cross-format feature superposition and consequential spurious activation.
- flyer23 1y agoIt is, also noone uses it:)
- Too 1y agoThis TOON is bound to have the same problem, because strings are not quoted. You can’t differentiate between the number 123 and the string ”123”. For LLM consumption, this might not matter, don’t use this for anything else.