> Biology is large, and you cannot seriously study modern biology if you flat out deny evolution. Suggestions to the contrary are simply absurd. If that was tr

> Biology is large, and you cannot seriously study modern biology if you flat out deny evolution. Suggestions to the contrary are simply absurd. If that was true, we could identify the intelligent design people by their scientific output. Instead, we find that evolutionists have to look at other evidence to purge them from the ranks of scientists. Evolution is a big deal so how about using valid arguments? > Knuth is Lutheran iirc, he could fall either way, I don't know which. The claim was that creationists can't do any valid science. If you can't look at Knuth's "work product" and tell us whether he's a creationist, the claim is clerly false. I agree that creationists can't do some types of science, but the actual instances are fairly small.