5 ms·
Exactly. But was it really the claim parent made that they don't? I understood the claim more like: Vaccines help, but economic divides will perpetuate the prob
by atoav 1y ago
Exactly. But was it really the claim parent made that they don't? I understood the claim more like: Vaccines help, but economic divides will perpetuate the problem in different ways.
And there is something to that claim. Because who doesn't get vaccinations? Because where are sanitary conditions so bad new variants develop? In places where people (and potentially animals) are crammed together without the ability of ill people to self quarantine. And those places are not typically rich and wealthy.
If you asked a top virologist if there is an socioeconomic component to virus contagion I'd expect most experts to agree that there is one.
- watwut 1y agoThere were two claims: > but in the long run they are a band-aid to the economical divides and exploitation. > If wars motivated by resource exploitation and class-system were not a thing vaccines would see a limited use. And neither is true. Absent inequality, vaccines are still very beneficial and useful. Absent war, vacciness are still beneficial and useful. War makes vaccines unavailable along with other treatments. Powerty is the same.
- fithisux 1y agoThis is exactly what I said. But vax-worshippers hear only the idol.