> and found its capabilities to be significantly inferior to that of a human, at least when it came to coding. I think we should step back and ask: do we reall

> and found its capabilities to be significantly inferior to that of a human, at least when it came to coding. I think we should step back and ask: do we really want that? What does that imply? Until recently nobody would use a tool and think, yuck, that was inferior of a human.