3 ms·
> House of Dynamite This is easily the best, inadvertent advertisement ever for boosting the nation's missile defense capabilities, and it's ironic that it cam
by _zagj 1y ago
> House of Dynamite
This is easily the best, inadvertent advertisement ever for boosting the nation's missile defense capabilities, and it's ironic that it came out of progressive Netflix studios, given that progressives have insisted since the 80s that missile defense is a worthless, impossible ("like hitting a bullet with a bullet") MIC boondoggle. Thanks, Netflix!
- Geezus_42 1y agoControlling shares are owned by Vanguard and BlackRock. I would not consider either to be progressive.
- gostsamo 1y agoCorporations don't have political leanings, they have market fit. The rest are your prejudices when encountering a product targeted at another consumer category than yours.
- andbberger 1y agothe movie would be over after 10 minutes if GBI intercepted why would you assume this is an accurate depiction
- ceejayoz 1y agoIt is like hitting a bullet with a bullet. That's become feasible recently, for the same reasons SpaceX is able to land a spacecraft now; computers and sensors got better. Unlike SpaceX's scenario, though, you've got an enemy involved, with a vested interest in defeating the system. SpaceX would have substantially more trouble landing if the landing ships had decoys and evasive maneuvers. It's probably viable against current North Korea, or "whoops we launched just one". It's probably not ever viable against Russia or China doing a full-on attack. (In other words, it's like hitting a bullet capable of hiding and making evasive maneuvers with a bullet.) Iran's attacks on Israel demonstrated this pretty well; some missiles still got through. Interceptors are expensive, often more so than the rounds they're intercepting.