3 ms·
LLMs are trained on human data, and aimed at perform tasks in human roles. That's the goal. It is supposed to be super, but superhuman. Able to interact with u
by alganet 1y ago
LLMs are trained on human data, and aimed at perform tasks in human roles. That's the goal.
It is supposed to be super, but superhuman. Able to interact with us.
Which leads us to the Turing Test (also, not a test... "the imitation game" is more of a philosophical exploration on thinking machines).
My comment assumes this is already understood as Turing explained.
If the thing is not human, then there's absolutely no way we can evaluate it. There's no way we can measure it. It becomes an impossible task.
- AstroBen 1y agoWhat's wrong with measuring and evaluating its outputs directly? If it can accurately file taxes better than us does it matter if it does it in a human manner? Birds and planes both fly and all
- alganet 1y agoIf your definition of AGI is filing taxes, then it's fine. Once we step into any other problem, then you need to measure that other problem as well. Lots of problems are concerned with how an intelligent being could fail. Our society is built on lots of those assumptions.