2 ms·
Ok, but ChatGPT speaks this language just as well as I do, and we also know that emotion isn't a core requirement of being a member of this species because psyc
by BugsJustFindMe 1y ago
Ok, but ChatGPT speaks this language just as well as I do, and we also know that emotion isn't a core requirement of being a member of this species because psychopaths exist.
Also, you don't know what species I am. Maybe I'm a dog. :-)
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_you're_a_dog https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Internet,_nobody_knows_...)
- nativeit 1y agoThat sounds awful.
- BugsJustFindMe 1y agoThis sounds like a bot comment.
- nativeit 1y agoHow would you know? Bots speak just as well as you do.
- runarberg 1y agoHuman-to-human communication is different from a human-to-computer communication. The google search engine speaks the same language as you, heck even the Hacker News speaks the same language as you as you are able to understand what each button on this page mean, and will respond correctly when you communicate back by pressing e.g. the “submit” button. Also assuming psychopaths don‘t experience emotions is going going with a very fringe theory of psychology. Very likely psycopaths experience emotions, they are maybe just very different emotions from the ones you and I experience. I think a better example would be a comatose person. That said I think talking about machine emotions is useless. I see emotions as a specific behavior state (that is you will behave in a more specific manner) given a specific pattern of stimuli. We can code our computers to do exactly that, but I think calling it emotions would just be confusing. Much rather I would simply call it a specific kind of state.