4 ms·
This is fine for a definition of AGI, but it's incomplete. It misses so many parts of the cognition that make humans flexible and successful. For example, emoti
by oidar 1y ago
This is fine for a definition of AGI, but it's incomplete. It misses so many parts of the cognition that make humans flexible and successful. For example, emotions, feelings, varied pattern recognition, propreception, embodied awareness, social skills, and navigating ambiguous situation w/o algorithms. If the described 10 spectrums of intelligence were maxed by an LLM, it would still fall short.
- pixl97 1y agoEh, I don't like the idea of 'intelligence' of any type using humans as the base line. It blinds it to our own limitations and things that may not be limits to other types of intelligence. The "AI won't kill us all because it doesn't have emotions" problem is one of these. For example, just because AI doesn't get angry, doesn't mean it can't recognize your anger and manipulate if given such a directive to.
- oidar 1y agoI agree, my point is that the cognition that creates emotion (and others) is of a different quality than the 10 listed in the paper.