they do not, but the same argument can hold true by the fact the true human nature is not really known and thus trying to define what a human like intelligence

they do not, but the same argument can hold true by the fact the true human nature is not really known and thus trying to define what a human like intelligence would consist of can only be incomplete. there are many parts of human cognition, phycology etc. especially related to consciousness that are known unknowns and/or completely unknown. a mitigation for this isaue would be to call it generally applicable intelligence or something, rather than human like intelligence. implying ita not specialized AI but also not human like. (i dont see why it would need to be human like, because even with all the right logic and intelligence a human can still do something counter to all of that. humans do this everyday. intuitive action, or irrational action etc. what we want is generally applicable intelligence, not human like intelligence.