3 ms·

Mostly the repetitive stuff like README generation and pushing code with meaningful commit messages was handled by AI. The actual work and logic were done by me

Mostly the repetitive stuff like README generation and pushing code with meaningful commit messages was handled by AI. The actual work and logic were done by me.

joshribakoff 1y ago
What about the commit that added tens of thousands of lines of markdown claiming to be an AI summary? Or the meaningful commit message of “.” And the commit editing 1,000s of lines of python code mislabeled as a docs change?
- theaniketgiri 1y ago
  Totally fair question! Docs / Markdown: AI handled repetitive stuff like READMEs and summaries. Core logic / Python: fully written by me. Commit messages: some minimal ones just for quick iterations — the real work is in the code. AI helped with boilerplate so I could ship faster; all functionality is hand-crafted.
  - computerthings 1y ago
    [dead]
  - joshribakoff 1y ago
    If the AI did the boilerplate that implies it was not fully written by you. The “meaningful commit messages” — again are a single period as the message for a single commit for the entire python portion of the codebase. My question was rhetorical. Whether the AI did it or a human did, it burns credibility to refer to things that don’t exist (like “meaningful commit messages”)
    - teruakohatu 1y ago
      Hacker News is a better place when we don’t attack people sharing their work. Your point was made. Well done to the author for shipping code. I look forward to trying it out.
      - Grimblewald 11mo ago
        > for sharing their work If it was their work your point would hold.
        theaniketgiri 11mo ago
        To clarify the AI question once and for all: What AI did: - Generated README templates (boilerplate markdown) - Suggested commit messages (I didn't always edit them) - Helped with documentation structure What I wrote: - All Python training logic (train.py, trainer.py, callbacks) - All model architectures (gpt.py, tiny.py, small.py, etc.) - Tokenizer integration - Data pipeline - CLI scaffolding (
        biinjo 11mo ago
        Don’t feed the trolls. This was your idea and you made something that works. Who cares if its (partially) done by AI. Whomever is taking offense by people using AI for coding, is just having a hard time adapting to the current state of affairs. It’s here, it’s happening. Try the project, if you like it thats great, if you don’t then move on. And if you don’t intent to try it for whatever reason that’s fine as well but don’t be salty to the OP for sharing their passion project.
        theaniketgiri 11mo ago
        Thanks for the support! Appreciate you trying it out. Let me know if you hit any issues or have ideas for improvements.
        Grimblewald 11mo ago
        It isn't trolling if there is a genuine concern. It isn't about the fact it is all AI generated, I don't care about that personally. I do however care if someone lies about provenance.
        deleted 11mo ago
        [deleted]
        11mo ago

Mostly the repetitive stuff like README generation and pushing code with meaningful commit messages was handled by AI. The actual work and logic were done by me.

joshribakoff 1y ago

What about the commit that added tens of thousands of lines of markdown claiming to be an AI summary? Or the meaningful commit message of “.” And the commit editing 1,000s of lines of python code mislabeled as a docs change?

theaniketgiri 1y ago
Totally fair question! Docs / Markdown: AI handled repetitive stuff like READMEs and summaries. Core logic / Python: fully written by me. Commit messages: some minimal ones just for quick iterations — the real work is in the code. AI helped with boilerplate so I could ship faster; all functionality is hand-crafted.
- computerthings 1y ago
  [dead]
- joshribakoff 1y ago
  If the AI did the boilerplate that implies it was not fully written by you. The “meaningful commit messages” — again are a single period as the message for a single commit for the entire python portion of the codebase. My question was rhetorical. Whether the AI did it or a human did, it burns credibility to refer to things that don’t exist (like “meaningful commit messages”)
  - teruakohatu 1y ago
    Hacker News is a better place when we don’t attack people sharing their work. Your point was made. Well done to the author for shipping code. I look forward to trying it out.
    - Grimblewald 11mo ago
      > for sharing their work If it was their work your point would hold.
      - theaniketgiri 11mo ago
        To clarify the AI question once and for all: What AI did: - Generated README templates (boilerplate markdown) - Suggested commit messages (I didn't always edit them) - Helped with documentation structure What I wrote: - All Python training logic (train.py, trainer.py, callbacks) - All model architectures (gpt.py, tiny.py, small.py, etc.) - Tokenizer integration - Data pipeline - CLI scaffolding (
        biinjo 11mo ago
        Don’t feed the trolls. This was your idea and you made something that works. Who cares if its (partially) done by AI. Whomever is taking offense by people using AI for coding, is just having a hard time adapting to the current state of affairs. It’s here, it’s happening. Try the project, if you like it thats great, if you don’t then move on. And if you don’t intent to try it for whatever reason that’s fine as well but don’t be salty to the OP for sharing their passion project.
        theaniketgiri 11mo ago
        Thanks for the support! Appreciate you trying it out. Let me know if you hit any issues or have ideas for improvements.
        Grimblewald 11mo ago
        It isn't trolling if there is a genuine concern. It isn't about the fact it is all AI generated, I don't care about that personally. I do however care if someone lies about provenance.
        deleted 11mo ago
        [deleted]
        11mo ago