4 ms·
>1979 critique of Zionism was early not really, not even close even with the "US-based" qualifier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_anti-Zionism https:/
by casey2 1y ago
>1979 critique of Zionism was early
not really, not even close even with the "US-based" qualifier https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_anti-Zionism https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_anti-Zionism
call me when sociology has any kind of predictive power and testable explanation then people might take your social classes hypothesis seriously. It's not just the foundation problems, the practical applications of social "sciences" have been failure after failure from demography to economics. If modern physics and chemistry concepts that we rely on today were as reproducible as the ANY social science concepts none of us would be here right now. Fundamentally there is nothing stopping social scientists from reducing the scope of their experiments to the reproducible. They haven't, largely so they can feel good about winning cheap political points, that's the privilege colonialism has afforded modern social scientists and they won't give up the drug til they die.