> But I would take a long bet that in 2050, France is closer to 0% nuclear power than it is to the current level. Maybe, but I think the corollary goal is to h

> But I would take a long bet that in 2050, France is closer to 0% nuclear power than it is to the current level. Maybe, but I think the corollary goal is to have nuclear power be a bigger part of the remaining non-renewables. So if (exaggerating grossly) it's 90% renewable, 9% nuclear, and 1% other, that's arguably still better than the current state.