2/3 of the piece rambles across various notions of conspicuous consumption (or lack there of) from Medieval society to descriptions of the family in Peter Pan (

2/3 of the piece rambles across various notions of conspicuous consumption (or lack there of) from Medieval society to descriptions of the family in Peter Pan (Bang-a-rang) or Jane Austin. Only then arriving at activism. Why not just take it as wrote, we get it, and get to the leap of logic that activism replaces handbags?