3 ms·
The _sellers_ want an alternative to iOS and Android. A possible reason why none exists on the market--at least not with significant numbers--might be that the
by fab13n 14y ago
The _sellers_ want an alternative to iOS and Android. A possible reason why none exists on the market--at least not with significant numbers--might be that the buyers don't want it. More precisely, buyers don't seem to want anything that sellers are able to produce at the price they'd be asking for it.
I'm not sure what are the proper rules to anthropomorphize the market, but I'd say that for the market to "want" something, you need sellers to produce something at a price which buyers are willing to pay.
You've got a polished and tightly controlled garden with iOS, a commoditized ecosystem in which to find commoditized phones with Android, and a base to develop one's own walled garden _a la_ Amazon, again with Android. There's nothing very exciting for non-Apple sellers here indeed, but that's a pretty good situation for buyers; I can't think of a buyer problem which would be best solved by a completely new OS.
- fab13n 14y agoACtually, the answer lies in the article: > why would an operator choose to work with you? > > we can integrate the operator’s value-added services into the device Translated in plain english: "Operators mourn the pre-iPhone times when hardware makers and consumers were their bitches. We'll try to sell them the leashes to get their bitches back, because they're the only one who've got a problem we can fix with a new OS"
- gavinlynch 14y agoYah. The public has been -clamoring- for crappy pre-smartphone branded apps like Verizon's V-Cast. Can't wait to buy mine. Hope it comes with RealPlayer too!