2 ms·
I wonder how you would compare it to nfs (which I believe can be TCP based, and probably encrypted) Not that it is a good comparison. NFS isn't super popular,
by m463 1y ago
I wonder how you would compare it to nfs (which I believe can be TCP based, and probably encrypted)
Not that it is a good comparison. NFS isn't super popular, macos can do it, I don't think windows can. But both windows and macos can do webdav.
- deleted 1y ago[deleted]
- devttyeu 1y agoNFS is much slower, maybe unless you deploy it which RDMA. I believe even 4.2 doesn’t really support asynchronous calls or has some significant limitations around them - I’ve commonly seen a single large write of a few gigs starve all other operations including lstat for minutes. Also it’s borderline impossible to tune nfs to go above 30gbps or so consistently, with WebDAV it’s a matter of adding a bunch more streams and you’re past 200gbps pretty easily.
- Saris 1y agoMy experience with NFS is its not very fast, compared to SMB or WebDAV