The OP never at any point suggested "harming them sexually". Her objection was to people making fetish content of her (or other real people) without their conse

The OP never at any point suggested "harming them sexually". Her objection was to people making fetish content of her (or other real people) without their consent, which is entirely a reasonable objection. Let us not misrepresent her. (As commented elsewhere, the author expressly opted-in, apparently with the intent of generating ragebait to write an article about.)