3 ms·

Good luck with that

• donkeybeer 1y ago
  Why not, I don't believe in special rights for anyone. Cops are not military and should be subject to the same powers and laws as everyone else. If a cop can arrest or shoot you, then you should be able to arrest and shoot cops too. I don't believe in special snowflake bullshit. If they hate that then they can wrap themselves in blanket and lock themselves into their houses, because if all your "balls" rely on having special rights its pure pussydom. I fully believe in changing the laws to this state of being.
  • cindyllm 1y ago
    [dead]
  • mycodendral 1y ago
    Ok, so you want to rewrite the existing legal force framework. Again, good luck with that. Folks who argue this rarely provide a coherent alternative that holds up to scrutiny. > ‘If a cop can arrest or shoot you, then you should be able to arrest and shoot cops too.’ Let me know when you’ve proposed a coherent legal framework that’s actually consistent with that idea.
    • donkeybeer 11mo ago
      Whats incoherent about it? That's it. We just remove all special powers from police. What more do you need?
      • mycodendral 11mo ago
        It’s incoherent if you value rule of law, markets, property, rights, or stability. If you’re willing to abandon all that over your police grievance, then sure, it’s coherent as anarchy.
        • donkeybeer 11mo ago
          Why not? Castle doctrine is already a thing in some states which allows you to shoot anyone including cops if they threaten you on your property and I think its a valid policy. How does rule of law and property rights suffer? Rule of law will improve if cops are not given special rights. They would think twice before doing anything illegal.
• donkeybeer 1y ago
  The answer to no problem is to give more power to the state. They already have infinite power.