2 ms·
It's a pedantic distinction with presumably zero consequences. Which is important to identify as it separates the eternally hopeful from those who've seen this
by bigyabai 1y ago
It's a pedantic distinction with presumably zero consequences.
Which is important to identify as it separates the eternally hopeful from those who've seen this cycle before.
- JumpCrisscross 1y ago> It's a pedantic distinction with presumably zero consequences You say from unfalsifiable supposition. That’s fine. You may not be wrong. But if the only evidence is mis-citing a shuttered programme, that’s important to note, too.