5 ms·
Are they right with the terminology? Do people consider mere bugs technical debt? I haven't seen simple, visible problems being considered as technical debt so
by i-con 1y ago
Are they right with the terminology? Do people consider mere bugs technical debt?
I haven't seen simple, visible problems being considered as technical debt so far. But rather only what the article calls architecture debt.
To me, it seems like the article indirectly proposes to use another term because the original one was used wrong too much. Do others see that, too?
- r-johnv 1y agoThis was exactly my thoughts. The article proposes a new word 'architecture debt' for most of what people consider 'tech debt', and then tries to say that architecture debt is a more serious concern than tech debt.