4 ms·
Well, given that they had to discuss among themselves whether the question was relevant or not, I'll guess that it wasn't a well-known issue. Even if it were,
by stavros 1y ago
Well, given that they had to discuss among themselves whether the question was relevant or not, I'll guess that it wasn't a well-known issue.
Even if it were, I wouldn't ban people for a year in my community, I'd simply have an "RTFM" bot response.
- GaryBluto 1y agoYou were not worthy of consorting with the council of wizards. In all seriousness though, I didn't need to search too hard to find numerous other testimonies of the project author acting neurotically. I'm not sure you missed out on much. Someone on Reddit mentioned being banned after joining the Telegram group for a similar question only a week ago.
- stavros 1y agoYeah, it seems that way. Ah well, it's his project, I see the ban as saving me time and aggravation.
- charcircuit 1y ago>Valetudo is not a community >Contrary to common expectations when it comes to software released under a FOSS-like license, Valetudo is not a community-driven project; nor does it even have a community in that sense. How can someone ban someone from a community if it doesn't have one.
- stavros 1y agoSaying it doesn't have a community doesn't magically make it true. There are people in that Telegram channel who talk to each other about the software, which is what a community is.
- Raptor75 1y agofunny thing, there was a bot with ready responses, created by a member of the community, and there was an RTFM bot response. guess what, eventually the member got banned and the bot got thrown out the window. also Hypfer likes to diss the bot, but him and his sycophants stillr egularly link to its responses. Hilarious!