>Many people are not looking for a "better C++", in the land of C++ it seems "better" means "more features", and some of us are not interested in more features,

>Many people are not looking for a "better C++", in the land of C++ it seems "better" means "more features", and some of us are not interested in more features, but in a better selection of fewer useful features. This is a knee jerk cliche reaction. D is much better designed than C++.