I think you misunderstood the article a bit by saying that the assertion is "that a new architecture will be the solution". That's not the assertion. It's simpl

I think you misunderstood the article a bit by saying that the assertion is "that a new architecture will be the solution". That's not the assertion. It's simply a statement about the lack of balance between exploration and exploitation. And the desire to rebalance it. What's wrong with that?