> You responded that this is a "gross overgeneralization of the content of the actual study", but the study appears to back up the original statement. It doesn

> You responded that this is a "gross overgeneralization of the content of the actual study", but the study appears to back up the original statement. It doesn't, and the study authors themselves are pretty clear about the limitations. The irony is that current foundation models are pretty good at helping to identify why this study doesn't offer useful general insights into the productivity benefits (or lack of) of AI-assisted development.