3 ms·
Sounds like the equivalent of a 4xl snowflake warehouse, which for such queries would take 30 seconds, with the added benefit of the data being cold stored in s
by ramraj07 1y ago
Sounds like the equivalent of a 4xl snowflake warehouse, which for such queries would take 30 seconds, with the added benefit of the data being cold stored in s3. Thus you only pay by the minute.
- hobs 1y agoNo, that would be equivalent to 64 4xl snowflake warehouses (though the rest of your point still stands).
- philbe77 1y agoCost-wise, 64 4xl Snowflake clusters would cost: 64 x $384/hr - for a total of: $24,576/hr (I believe)
- __mharrison__ 1y agoWhat was the cost of the duck implementation?
- ramraj07 1y agoApologize for getting it wrong a few orders of magnitude, but thats even more ghastly if its so overpowered and yet takes this long.
- philbe77 1y agoChallenge accepted - I'll try it on a 4XL Snowflake to get actual perf/cost