4 ms·
Here in Brazil, most of the forest currently disappearing is because farmers want the land to raise cattle and make money off selling meat. Not paper. Though f
by vibrunazo 14y ago
Here in Brazil, most of the forest currently disappearing is because farmers want the land to raise cattle and make money off selling meat. Not paper.
Though forests used to be cut down for paper. That's no longer the case because it's not profitable anymore. Because of lack of demand.
But while the parent poster is right that virtually all paper today comes from sustainably farmed wood. That's still an ecological problem. Because sustainably farmed wood is not native to our eco system. Brazilian flora might take centuries to grow, so farmers would chop down local trees to plant European pine trees instead. Their propaganda, which the parent poster bought into, is that if you chop a tree to plant another, then no harm is done. But that's not how eco systems work. Local fauna cannot live in foreign pine trees, just as they wouldn't live in a concrete city. So many local species are now endangered or extinct because of paper farms.
I live on an area where a lot of paper farming used to happen. I had an American friend come here once. He told me the forest around the highway we were on surprised him. Because it looked nothing like the movies he seen, instead it looked just like Europe, with regularly spaced tall pine trees. He asked "is this where the monkeys are?", looking closely to the pines hoping to see one. Unfortunately, I told him, during my whole life here I have never seen a monkey in the wild. Even though this same place used to be the home of some really interesting species, like the golden lion monkey. But we could go to the zoo to see one if he wanted to.
Source of this is my experience as a local who used to be an active Greenpeace volunteer, back in the day.
- mseebach2 14y agoIt pretty rich for a Greenpeace activist to accuse others of buying into propaganda. Greenpeace is nothing if not a propaganda organisation. For the record, I didn't suggest that replacing old growth forest with fast-growing trees foreign to the ecosystems is neutral or sustainable.