3 ms·
The "blog" belongs to a Canadian scientist who's been talking about turbo cancers after mRNA vaccines for years now! He's citing studies, theory, etc. So, if it
by nikolay 1y ago
The "blog" belongs to a Canadian scientist who's been talking about turbo cancers after mRNA vaccines for years now! He's citing studies, theory, etc. So, if it's PubMed you will call it "a site," right? It's a serious online publication, not "a blog"!
- dc396 1y agoHint 1: look at the URL and note the word "blog". Hint 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo_cancer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo_cancer I can point to blogs too, here are a couple: - https://ezra.com/en-gb/blog/turbo-cancer https://ezra.com/en-gb/blog/turbo-cancer - https://globalvaccinedatanetwork.org/news/turbo_cancer_and_mrna_myth_that_defies_biology_and_physics https://globalvaccinedatanetwork.org/news/turbo_cancer_and_m... As for your appeal to authority, Andrew Wakefield was once considered a scientist as well. The fact that a scientist talks about something for years or gets papers published means little. What matters is actual, independently reproducible data.