I could have been more specific than "consistent set of ideas". The thing writes down a coherent identity for itself that it play-acts, actively telling the use

I could have been more specific than "consistent set of ideas". The thing writes down a coherent identity for itself that it play-acts, actively telling the user it is a living entity. I think that's bad. On the second point, I take you to be referring to the fact that the psychosis cases often seem to involve the discovery of allegedly really important meta-ideas that are actually gibberish. I think it is giving the gibberish too much credit to say that it is "aligned to the history of its constitution" just because it is about ideas and LLMs also involve... ideas. To me the explanation is that these concepts are so vacuous, you can say anything about them.