4 ms·
because all the safety stuff is bullshit. it's like asking a mirror company to make mirrors that modify the image to prevent the viewer from seeing anything the
by dingnuts 1y ago
because all the safety stuff is bullshit. it's like asking a mirror company to make mirrors that modify the image to prevent the viewer from seeing anything they don't like
good fucking luck. these things are mirrors and they are not controllable. "safety" is bullshit, ESPECIALLY if real superintelligence was invented. Yeah, we're going to have guardrails that outsmart something 100x smarter than us? how's that supposed to work?
if you put in ugliness you'll get ugliness out of them and there's no escaping that.
people who want "safety" for these things are asking for a motor vehicle that isn't dangerous to operate. get real, physical reality is going to get in the way.
- dcre 1y agoI think you are severely underestimating the amount of really bad stuff these things would say if the labs put no effort in here. Plus they have to optimize for some definition of good output regardless.
- crimsoneer 1y agobut... we do all drive motor vehicles, right.
- ffsm8 1y agoThe term "safety" in the llm context is a little overloaded Personally, I'm not a fan either - but it's not always obvious to the user when they're effectively poisoning their own context, and that's where these features are useful, still.