"Modern" in my mind has come to mean: * Designed at the highest possible level, on top of multiple layers of frameworks, libraries, and dependencies that the d

"Modern" in my mind has come to mean: * Designed at the highest possible level, on top of multiple layers of frameworks, libraries, and dependencies that the developers do not fully understand. * Full of anti-patterns that implicate privacy and security in a variety of ways. * Designed as a walled garden, offering hobbled interoperability with other solutions, while attempting to vertically integrate features better implemented elsewhere -- or, in some cases, the exact opposite: designed as an excessively minimal solution, leaving concerns that should be addressed within its own scope unhandled. * Unlikely to be viable for long-term deployment due to high time sensitivity in its dependencies; correspondingly fragile in ways that aren't fully accounted for. * Built with a UI adhering to no coherent design patterns, targeting the presumed ability limits of people who will never likely use the product, while being wholly insufficient for those who actually do. * Released prematurely with half-implemented features, unmitigated bugs, and incomplete documentation. * Overhyped to the point that the majority of public discussion about the project consists of vague, unverifiable bullshit.