> It is a shame both sides explored this politically in the most superficial manner. It was one side. The liberals were trying to have the conversation you men

> It is a shame both sides explored this politically in the most superficial manner. It was one side. The liberals were trying to have the conversation you mentioned, with extensive discussion about why this wasn’t as severe in other countries due to differences in farming practices or talking about vaccination, but the Republican strategists saw an opportunity in just hammering the idea that Biden had some kind of magic egg price lever in his office. Saying “both sides” is supporting them by reinforcing their framing even though it’s ahistorical.