4 ms·

I love this idea, but can't find anything about it. Is this a neologism you just coined? If so, is there any particular paper or work that led you to think abou

• js8 1y ago
  Yes, I just coined the neologism. It was supposed to be partly sarcastic (why stay at pixels, why not just go fully multimodal and treat the missing channels as missing information?), I am kind of surprised why it got so upvoted. (IME, often my comments which I think are deep get ignored but silly things, where I was thinking "this is too much trolling or obvious", get upvoted; but don't take it the wrong way, I am flattered you like it.)
  • throwaway-aws9 1y ago
    Should future attributions in white papers go to js8 from HN?
  • SJMG 1y ago
    Deep things often, not always, take more attention to appreciate than the superficial. It's a precious resource people are seldom disposed to allocate a lot of when headline-surfing HN.
  • jaredhansen 1y ago
    I think there's a decent chance you may have just created the ideal name for what will become one of the most important concepts ever. Bravo!
  • causal 1y ago
    Pretending channels can be effectively merged into a single percel vector, that would open up interesting channels beyond human perception even, e.g. lidar. Or it would be interesting to train a model that feels at home in 4D space.