3 ms·
need obsidian open source alternative
by tonyhart7 1y ago
need obsidian open source alternative
- mastazi 1y agoI'm not sure what your needs are, but I've been using Joplin and it works for me.
- teekert 1y agoTried Joplin, it creates an unholy mess of files. I far prefer the clear format of Obsidian.
- ezst 1y agoNext step is to give up on files/filesystem. As long as it's opensource, there's no lock-in. As long as the storage backend is clean and structured (SQLite or comparable), you actually get so much more (full text indexing, standard querying, ...) I initially was cautious when going from "bunch of .MD files" to https://triliumnotes.org/ https://triliumnotes.org/ , since it's been pretty great.
- teekert 1y agoHmmm, it has been years since I last tried it, perhaps it is time for another chance indeed. Thanx.
- rubymamis 1y agoYou can check my FOSS note-taking app: https://notes-foss.com https://notes-foss.com
- pcthrowaway 1y agoLooks great! I'll follow along so I can try it out if syntax-aware code blocks and callouts are ever supported
- rubymamis 1y agoGreat! They will be supported earlier on my non-FOSS note-taking app with a block editor (get-notes.com). So you can follow their as well.
- linhns 1y agoThis looks impressive. Nice to see a modern, sleek app built with Qt + QML. I moved on from raw Qt after my last job, will take a look at using QML.
- duckerduck 1y agoI am a fan of Logseq [0] as well, although it’s slightly different in that it is mostly for bulleted notes and not long-form prose. [0]: https://logseq.com/ https://logseq.com/
- liqilin1567 1y agoI tired Joplin, Logseq and Appflowy but ended up with siyuan
- ezst 1y agohttps://triliumnotes.org/ https://triliumnotes.org/ is my clear recommendation. It's quite more powerful than the usual contenders and it may take a while to explore its depths, but it's also not pushing its complexity in your face like Logseq and some others do.