4 ms·

Such certainty. Can you provide the data to back up your assertion?

• nikolay 1y ago
  Sure [0]! [0]: https://merogenomics.ca/blog/en/178/Turbo-cancers-help-guide https://merogenomics.ca/blog/en/178/Turbo-cancers-help-guide
  • dc396 1y ago
    You're calling a handwaving blog with no citations to scientific studies published by a company that just happens to offer consulting to identify possible risks associated with a made up term not generally accepted by the medical community that their service can detect as data?
    • nikolay 1y ago
      The "blog" belongs to a Canadian scientist who's been talking about turbo cancers after mRNA vaccines for years now! He's citing studies, theory, etc. So, if it's PubMed you will call it "a site," right? It's a serious online publication, not "a blog"!
      • dc396 1y ago
        Hint 1: look at the URL and note the word "blog". Hint 2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo_cancer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turbo_cancer I can point to blogs too, here are a couple: - https://ezra.com/en-gb/blog/turbo-cancer https://ezra.com/en-gb/blog/turbo-cancer - https://globalvaccinedatanetwork.org/news/turbo_cancer_and_mrna_myth_that_defies_biology_and_physics https://globalvaccinedatanetwork.org/news/turbo_cancer_and_m... As for your appeal to authority, Andrew Wakefield was once considered a scientist as well. The fact that a scientist talks about something for years or gets papers published means little. What matters is actual, independently reproducible data.