9 ms·

CarPlay is probably the top of my list of features when I buy a car. I can careless about performance specs after a certain threshold. But not having CarPlay wo

CarPlay is probably the top of my list of features when I buy a car. I can careless about performance specs after a certain threshold. But not having CarPlay would straight up go into my do not buy list (yes, I wouldn’t buy a Rivian or tesla either.)

jbm 1y ago
I used to feel this way, but nowadays I've come to realize that Carplay's UX is inferior to my iPhone's UX on a mount. As long as I have Bluetooth or Aux-in, I'm fine. (That isn't to say that I think GM will somehow produce anything other than a captured rent extraction tool)
- dangus 1y ago
  You might as well be making the “I’m okay with my 2004 Honda accord with a tape adapter” argument. There is no cost reason to exclude the option. Even if I don’t use it, if I’m buying a $30-50k new vehicle it better have it, even if that’s for the sake of resale or future family members I might pass the car down to. My 2016 has it, why am I tolerating the removing of such a feature? If you want unscientific evidence you’ll notice that the Honda Prologue (has CarPlay) outsells the Equinox EV it’s based on. https://gmauthority.com/blog/2024/06/about-one-third-of-car-buyers-insist-on-apple-carplay-or-android-auto-study/ https://gmauthority.com/blog/2024/06/about-one-third-of-car-...
  - olyjohn 1y ago
    I think it's hilarious that I can upgrade my 2004 Honda Accord and add CarPlay into it with a myriad of screen sizes and options, features, cameras. There's an entire world of car stereo / infotainment gear out there that is cheaper and better than ever. Meanwhile, everybody with their new cars are just stuck with the terrible built in systems, or can only upgrade with a $1000 worth of audio processing gear and multi-channel amplifiers.
    - dangus 1y ago
      I think this is a negative recency bias, nobody makes aftermarket stuff for brand new cars because nobody with a brand new car is trying to augment it. You can find infotainment replacement systems for more recent cars. Example: https://www.caraudiocoho.com/products/mazda-6-car-radio-multimedia-player-1025screen-2017-2019-android-100-1920720-octa-core-6-128g-andriod-oem-system https://www.caraudiocoho.com/products/mazda-6-car-radio-mult...
      - olyjohn 1y ago
        Your link proves my exact point. You need some specific one-off gear from some no-name android tablet manufacturer that doesn't fit any other car. LOL@ this thing running Android 12, which was out of support in March of this year... Much aftermarket support wow. The 2004 Accord has a DIN slot in it. Which has a myriad of options available for it, despite the dwindling aftermarket. Have you seen how to upgrade a 2023 Honda Accord infotainment system? You can't without major work. You can use the factory head unit, and feed all the amplified signals into a $1000+ sound processor, with a bunch of other modules specifically built for the car, then run the speaker outputs out to some crazy-ass 8 channel amplifier (because more speakers means the stereo is better for some reason), then feed that back to your speakers. And then at that point, all you've upgraded is the audio, not even the head unit itself. And why does it even have a center channel again? Also, people obviously care about what infotainment is in their cars, as there is a huge amount of people saying they won't buy a car without CarPlay. Sounds like people DO want to augment their infotainment systems. Nobody is trying to do it, because you can't do it. Imagine if you could buy the car you wanted, and install your own accessories in it.
        dangus 1y ago
        Look, I wasn’t even getting into proprietary or not. Obviously generic DIN was better than the present automotive industry situation. You made a claim that you can’t upgrade these systems without $1000 of gear and I proved that idea wrong with a single link. It doesn’t really matter that it’s Android 12 - nobody really cares because all it has to do is run CarPlay and Android Auto. As long as the system can do that it’s infinitely upgradable from a software perspective. Nobody’s actually using the base Android system. I also have a friend that spent under $500 to add CarPlay to a Chevy Sonic with a similar system and they’re very happy with it. And that’s why I want a car to have CarPlay and Android auto, because it negates any need to upgrade the system down the line. The upgrades happen on your phone. Imagine if you could install your own accessories in it…like the one I linked? I mean, again, I get it, it’s not a simple DIN setup but for the 1% of people who are interested in upgrading their car system this this is a real product you can buy for basically any car model. I owned an Alpine head unit for my 2005 Volkswagen and I wouldn’t really describe it as not janky compared to the OEM head unit, but the thing had Bluetooth and that’s all I needed.
  - jbm 1y ago
    My "real lived experience" with a CarPlay device that I installed into my 2016 Toyota Sienna is that it was slow, annoying, and I actually removed it. You can have it for free if you are in the Calgary area, my email is in my profile. The UX difference compared to my phone, and the change in speed / etc.. was infuriating. The experience with my phone was ALWAYS better. An argument based on the desires of fiscally illiterate people with 19.99% APR loans on oversized cars would make more sense if I worked for an auto company, thankfully I don't.
    - dangus 1y ago
      Yeah that’s a Toyota problem, not a typical experience of old wired CarPlay systems at all. And again I’m not making some kind of pro-consumerism buy a new car right now argument, I’m just saying that in 2025 CarPlay and Android Auto are high demand features that a lot of people insist upon. I’m not making some kind of profound statement on the state of the car industry or whether infotainment is too deeply integrated into vehicles. I’m just saying if it was time for me to buy a new car I’m thinking twice about buying something that’s not giving me phone mirroring, just like I want my car to have FM radio even if I rarely or never use it.
  - troad 1y ago
    > You might as well be making the “I’m okay with my 2004 Honda accord with a tape adapter” argument. I love how authoritatively you say this, as though this is meant to be just so patently absurd it doesn't require any further argument. This is an attempted reductio ad absurdum, but the absurdum in question fails to actually be abusrd. Not everyone wants to drop $50K every few years on some liquid-glass-operated subscription-based monstrosity. Some people much prefer cars operated by knobs and dials, that are easy to repair, and dirt-cheap to replace. It's simply superior tech.
- pjmlp 1y ago
  Same here in regards to Android. I only care about bluetooth for music and handling phone calls, don't get the point why having the actual car dashboard show phone stuff that relevant.
listenallyall 1y ago
I think this may be the dilemma GM and others are in. Given that it's a must-have, how much can Google and Apple charge the manufacturers for a license? $2000 per car? 5000? More? I dont think you can necessarily criticize GM's decision (and making a public announcement that all other car manufacturers will read) without knowing the upstream costs.
- acdha 1y ago
  Is there any public data on how much those licenses cost?
  - 486sx33 1y ago
    [dead]
  - tehwebguy 1y ago
    I don’t know but my best guess is in the low hundreds given the Vline sells for $679. Just installed one in a 2008 Lexus with a resistive touch screen and ancient interface, now I’ve got CarPlay. https://gromaudio.com/store/vline/ https://gromaudio.com/store/vline/
    - acdha 1y ago
      Thanks, that's a good data point.
- AlotOfReading 1y ago
  There aren't really any licensing fees for Android Auto. Apple charged a few dozen dollars for the right to produce a car with the integration, rather than a license as such. There's integration costs and hardware, so it's not free, but generally it's cheaper than the alternative. Android automotive, the system GM is discussing here, is more expensive in every way than Android Auto. The reason they're switching is that Android Auto/carplay don't give GM enough additional monetization options for customers.
  - 1y ago
Casteil 1y ago
Yep. Manufacturers ditching Apple Carplay/Android Auto support will, if not immediately, inevitably pursue rent-seeking behavior in the form of paid subscriptions for services people could otherwise just have for free (and likely better) via phone.
- etempleton 1y ago
  It is a crazy step for GM in particular because it is not like they have any distinct advantages or differentiators as an automaker. Rivian and Tesla have specific niche appeal. I am not sure anyone is clamoring for a Chevy in the same way. Lack of Apple car play is a feature your average user will be aware of and consider when purchasing a new car.
  - nothercastle 1y ago
    GMs top end vehicles have been plagued with exploding engines recently so to remove CarPlay is a crazy move. I wonder how much additional revenue they expect from pushing ads and their shitty infotainment experience
mandeepj 1y ago
> CarPlay is probably the top of my list of features when I buy a car. It's so important and useful to me that I've been thinking of retrofitting my Corvette C6, either by jailbreaking an iPad or simply mounting it.
- Quitschquat 1y ago
  Retrofitted my 2010 Tacoma beater because I can’t live without CarPlay
- dragon-hn 1y ago
  For what it is worth, there are lots of double DIN aftermarket AirPlay options for a C6. No need for an iPad.
  - mandeepj 1y ago
    > there are lots of double DIN aftermarket AirPlay You might call me spoiled, but I find 6” screen to be too small.
    - vgeek 1y ago
      Check out the floating double DIN receivers like Alpine's Halo11 or search eBay for dozens of cheap no-name ones-- not sure about their SQ, though.
      - mandeepj 1y ago
        Thanks! I found this one while searching for what I was looking for - https://www.knightdrivetv.com/products/c6-corvette-10-8-full-console-hvac-btooth-wifi-screen-founding-buyer-link-closes-june-2nd https://www.knightdrivetv.com/products/c6-corvette-10-8-full... It’s almost same price as Halo11, but seems to be far better product and fit! During first look of it, it felt expensive, but after looking at Halo11, it seems affordable :-)
JumpCrisscross 1y ago
> CarPlay is probably the top of my list of features when I buy a car Do you own a GM vehicle? Were you considering it? No CarPlay is a dealbreaker for me too. I’m just not convinced there are that many of us.
- pbh101 1y ago
  The number I’ve seen is that CarPlay specifically is in the top ~2 prios for 79% of new car shoppers in the US. I think there’s probably enough mass here, and GM doesn’t have the niche EV/SW cachet that Rivian and Tesla have despite lacking CarPlay so I don’t think this will go well for them.
- AlotOfReading 1y ago
  It's basically the feature to a huge number of consumers. Various numbers I've seen place not having it as a dealbreaker for somewhere between 15% to 80% of buyers, especially the younger ones. It's more important than virtually any other feature you can name.
  - ryandrake 1y ago
    Wild how different people’s expectations can be. I’ve never even owned a car with any of these systems, yet they’re dealbreakers for others. Not saying they’re good or bad, just remarking on how something one person has never even thought about could be an absolute requirement for someone else!
    - AlotOfReading 1y ago
      It's surprisingly common. A lot of standard features (reclining seats, AC, large fuel tanks, back seats, large trunks, fuel efficiency) aren't important to all buyers, but they're important to some buyers. Over time they creep into the standard feature set as manufacturers design new models because the economies of scale from additional customers and a simpler production line outweigh the additional costs.
    - dpark 1y ago
teleforce 1y ago
+1 For me Android Auto is a must, it's a no brainer as a requirement for a new modern car. For the Love of God, what the GM, Rivian and Tesla engineers are thinking by not including CarPlay and Android Auto?
- pjmlp 1y ago
  Nothing, this is obviously a management decision.
tonyedgecombe 1y ago
>I can careless about performance specs after a certain threshold. Don't you mean couldn't?

jbm 1y ago

I used to feel this way, but nowadays I've come to realize that Carplay's UX is inferior to my iPhone's UX on a mount. As long as I have Bluetooth or Aux-in, I'm fine. (That isn't to say that I think GM will somehow produce anything other than a captured rent extraction tool)

dangus 1y ago
You might as well be making the “I’m okay with my 2004 Honda accord with a tape adapter” argument. There is no cost reason to exclude the option. Even if I don’t use it, if I’m buying a $30-50k new vehicle it better have it, even if that’s for the sake of resale or future family members I might pass the car down to. My 2016 has it, why am I tolerating the removing of such a feature? If you want unscientific evidence you’ll notice that the Honda Prologue (has CarPlay) outsells the Equinox EV it’s based on. https://gmauthority.com/blog/2024/06/about-one-third-of-car-buyers-insist-on-apple-carplay-or-android-auto-study/ https://gmauthority.com/blog/2024/06/about-one-third-of-car-...
- olyjohn 1y ago
  I think it's hilarious that I can upgrade my 2004 Honda Accord and add CarPlay into it with a myriad of screen sizes and options, features, cameras. There's an entire world of car stereo / infotainment gear out there that is cheaper and better than ever. Meanwhile, everybody with their new cars are just stuck with the terrible built in systems, or can only upgrade with a $1000 worth of audio processing gear and multi-channel amplifiers.
  - dangus 1y ago
    I think this is a negative recency bias, nobody makes aftermarket stuff for brand new cars because nobody with a brand new car is trying to augment it. You can find infotainment replacement systems for more recent cars. Example: https://www.caraudiocoho.com/products/mazda-6-car-radio-multimedia-player-1025screen-2017-2019-android-100-1920720-octa-core-6-128g-andriod-oem-system https://www.caraudiocoho.com/products/mazda-6-car-radio-mult...
    - olyjohn 1y ago
      Your link proves my exact point. You need some specific one-off gear from some no-name android tablet manufacturer that doesn't fit any other car. LOL@ this thing running Android 12, which was out of support in March of this year... Much aftermarket support wow. The 2004 Accord has a DIN slot in it. Which has a myriad of options available for it, despite the dwindling aftermarket. Have you seen how to upgrade a 2023 Honda Accord infotainment system? You can't without major work. You can use the factory head unit, and feed all the amplified signals into a $1000+ sound processor, with a bunch of other modules specifically built for the car, then run the speaker outputs out to some crazy-ass 8 channel amplifier (because more speakers means the stereo is better for some reason), then feed that back to your speakers. And then at that point, all you've upgraded is the audio, not even the head unit itself. And why does it even have a center channel again? Also, people obviously care about what infotainment is in their cars, as there is a huge amount of people saying they won't buy a car without CarPlay. Sounds like people DO want to augment their infotainment systems. Nobody is trying to do it, because you can't do it. Imagine if you could buy the car you wanted, and install your own accessories in it.
      - dangus 1y ago
        Look, I wasn’t even getting into proprietary or not. Obviously generic DIN was better than the present automotive industry situation. You made a claim that you can’t upgrade these systems without $1000 of gear and I proved that idea wrong with a single link. It doesn’t really matter that it’s Android 12 - nobody really cares because all it has to do is run CarPlay and Android Auto. As long as the system can do that it’s infinitely upgradable from a software perspective. Nobody’s actually using the base Android system. I also have a friend that spent under $500 to add CarPlay to a Chevy Sonic with a similar system and they’re very happy with it. And that’s why I want a car to have CarPlay and Android auto, because it negates any need to upgrade the system down the line. The upgrades happen on your phone. Imagine if you could install your own accessories in it…like the one I linked? I mean, again, I get it, it’s not a simple DIN setup but for the 1% of people who are interested in upgrading their car system this this is a real product you can buy for basically any car model. I owned an Alpine head unit for my 2005 Volkswagen and I wouldn’t really describe it as not janky compared to the OEM head unit, but the thing had Bluetooth and that’s all I needed.
- jbm 1y ago
  My "real lived experience" with a CarPlay device that I installed into my 2016 Toyota Sienna is that it was slow, annoying, and I actually removed it. You can have it for free if you are in the Calgary area, my email is in my profile. The UX difference compared to my phone, and the change in speed / etc.. was infuriating. The experience with my phone was ALWAYS better. An argument based on the desires of fiscally illiterate people with 19.99% APR loans on oversized cars would make more sense if I worked for an auto company, thankfully I don't.
  - dangus 1y ago
    Yeah that’s a Toyota problem, not a typical experience of old wired CarPlay systems at all. And again I’m not making some kind of pro-consumerism buy a new car right now argument, I’m just saying that in 2025 CarPlay and Android Auto are high demand features that a lot of people insist upon. I’m not making some kind of profound statement on the state of the car industry or whether infotainment is too deeply integrated into vehicles. I’m just saying if it was time for me to buy a new car I’m thinking twice about buying something that’s not giving me phone mirroring, just like I want my car to have FM radio even if I rarely or never use it.
- troad 1y ago
  > You might as well be making the “I’m okay with my 2004 Honda accord with a tape adapter” argument. I love how authoritatively you say this, as though this is meant to be just so patently absurd it doesn't require any further argument. This is an attempted reductio ad absurdum, but the absurdum in question fails to actually be abusrd. Not everyone wants to drop $50K every few years on some liquid-glass-operated subscription-based monstrosity. Some people much prefer cars operated by knobs and dials, that are easy to repair, and dirt-cheap to replace. It's simply superior tech.
pjmlp 1y ago
Same here in regards to Android. I only care about bluetooth for music and handling phone calls, don't get the point why having the actual car dashboard show phone stuff that relevant.

listenallyall 1y ago

I think this may be the dilemma GM and others are in. Given that it's a must-have, how much can Google and Apple charge the manufacturers for a license? $2000 per car? 5000? More? I dont think you can necessarily criticize GM's decision (and making a public announcement that all other car manufacturers will read) without knowing the upstream costs.

acdha 1y ago
Is there any public data on how much those licenses cost?
- 486sx33 1y ago
  [dead]
- tehwebguy 1y ago
  I don’t know but my best guess is in the low hundreds given the Vline sells for $679. Just installed one in a 2008 Lexus with a resistive touch screen and ancient interface, now I’ve got CarPlay. https://gromaudio.com/store/vline/ https://gromaudio.com/store/vline/
  - acdha 1y ago
    Thanks, that's a good data point.
AlotOfReading 1y ago
There aren't really any licensing fees for Android Auto. Apple charged a few dozen dollars for the right to produce a car with the integration, rather than a license as such. There's integration costs and hardware, so it's not free, but generally it's cheaper than the alternative. Android automotive, the system GM is discussing here, is more expensive in every way than Android Auto. The reason they're switching is that Android Auto/carplay don't give GM enough additional monetization options for customers.
- 1y ago

Casteil 1y ago

Yep. Manufacturers ditching Apple Carplay/Android Auto support will, if not immediately, inevitably pursue rent-seeking behavior in the form of paid subscriptions for services people could otherwise just have for free (and likely better) via phone.

etempleton 1y ago
It is a crazy step for GM in particular because it is not like they have any distinct advantages or differentiators as an automaker. Rivian and Tesla have specific niche appeal. I am not sure anyone is clamoring for a Chevy in the same way. Lack of Apple car play is a feature your average user will be aware of and consider when purchasing a new car.
- nothercastle 1y ago
  GMs top end vehicles have been plagued with exploding engines recently so to remove CarPlay is a crazy move. I wonder how much additional revenue they expect from pushing ads and their shitty infotainment experience

mandeepj 1y ago

> CarPlay is probably the top of my list of features when I buy a car. It's so important and useful to me that I've been thinking of retrofitting my Corvette C6, either by jailbreaking an iPad or simply mounting it.

Quitschquat 1y ago
Retrofitted my 2010 Tacoma beater because I can’t live without CarPlay
dragon-hn 1y ago
For what it is worth, there are lots of double DIN aftermarket AirPlay options for a C6. No need for an iPad.
- mandeepj 1y ago
  > there are lots of double DIN aftermarket AirPlay You might call me spoiled, but I find 6” screen to be too small.
  - vgeek 1y ago
    Check out the floating double DIN receivers like Alpine's Halo11 or search eBay for dozens of cheap no-name ones-- not sure about their SQ, though.
    - mandeepj 1y ago
      Thanks! I found this one while searching for what I was looking for - https://www.knightdrivetv.com/products/c6-corvette-10-8-full-console-hvac-btooth-wifi-screen-founding-buyer-link-closes-june-2nd https://www.knightdrivetv.com/products/c6-corvette-10-8-full... It’s almost same price as Halo11, but seems to be far better product and fit! During first look of it, it felt expensive, but after looking at Halo11, it seems affordable :-)

JumpCrisscross 1y ago

> CarPlay is probably the top of my list of features when I buy a car Do you own a GM vehicle? Were you considering it? No CarPlay is a dealbreaker for me too. I’m just not convinced there are that many of us.

pbh101 1y ago
The number I’ve seen is that CarPlay specifically is in the top ~2 prios for 79% of new car shoppers in the US. I think there’s probably enough mass here, and GM doesn’t have the niche EV/SW cachet that Rivian and Tesla have despite lacking CarPlay so I don’t think this will go well for them.
AlotOfReading 1y ago
It's basically the feature to a huge number of consumers. Various numbers I've seen place not having it as a dealbreaker for somewhere between 15% to 80% of buyers, especially the younger ones. It's more important than virtually any other feature you can name.
- ryandrake 1y ago
  Wild how different people’s expectations can be. I’ve never even owned a car with any of these systems, yet they’re dealbreakers for others. Not saying they’re good or bad, just remarking on how something one person has never even thought about could be an absolute requirement for someone else!
  - AlotOfReading 1y ago
    It's surprisingly common. A lot of standard features (reclining seats, AC, large fuel tanks, back seats, large trunks, fuel efficiency) aren't important to all buyers, but they're important to some buyers. Over time they creep into the standard feature set as manufacturers design new models because the economies of scale from additional customers and a simpler production line outweigh the additional costs.
  - dpark 1y ago

teleforce 1y ago

+1 For me Android Auto is a must, it's a no brainer as a requirement for a new modern car. For the Love of God, what the GM, Rivian and Tesla engineers are thinking by not including CarPlay and Android Auto?

pjmlp 1y ago
Nothing, this is obviously a management decision.

tonyedgecombe 1y ago

>I can careless about performance specs after a certain threshold. Don't you mean couldn't?