3 ms·
Instead of trash, reimplementing rm (to only really delete after some time or depending on resource usage or to shred of you are paranoid if the goal is to real
by YouAreWRONGtoo 1y ago
Instead of trash, reimplementing rm (to only really delete after some time or depending on resource usage or to shred of you are paranoid if the goal is to really delete something) or using zfs makes much more sense.
- orhmeh09 1y agoI can't imagine a scenario where I would want to reimplement rm just for this.
- YouAreWRONGtoo 1y ago[flagged]
- latexr 1y agohttps://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html > Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes. Instead of being rude to a fellow human making an inoffensive remark, you could’ve spent your words being kind and describing the scenario you claim exists. For all you know, maybe they did ask ChatGPT and were unconvinced by the answer. As a side note, I don’t even understand how your swipe would make sense. If anything, needing ChatGPT is what demonstrates a lack of imagination (having the latter you don’t need the former).
- YouAreWRONGtoo 1y agoWhat makes you think I need ChatGPT, since I just wondered whether ChatGPT was as stupid, since obviously I do know why that would be useful?
- thiht 1y agoHow is this better?
- alanh 1y agoThe idea of changing what 'rm' does sets off all of my "foot-gun" alarm bells