>>Oh I see, thanks for explaining, you are rejecting the underlying science I certainly do no such thing. >>What about the study do you not find convincing?

>>Oh I see, thanks for explaining, you are rejecting the underlying science I certainly do no such thing. >>What about the study do you not find convincing? I do find it convincing, what I don't find convincing is OP's assertion that because they missed some time period in their daughter's life feeding her peanuts she developed a peanut allergy. It's not an "if X then Y" system - and the study does talk about it in terms of probabilities, not certainties.