> (...) while Starlink (...) were simply not answering to the criterias requested. If you read the article, that's not exactly the arguments pointed out by nei

> (...) while Starlink (...) were simply not answering to the criterias requested. If you read the article, that's not exactly the arguments pointed out by neither Tusass nor Greenland's politicians. Cited from the article: > Binzer said it was not about which company was better, but about trust and long-term cooperation. Tusass already works with Eutelsat and knows their systems well. > Some Greenlandic politicians have warned that the country must keep control of its telecom infrastructure. > They fear that opening the market to foreign providers could threaten national security. For now, Tusass remains the sole provider of telecommunications in Greenland. The citations from the article are clear on how national security concerns were a key argument to not go with Starlink.