3 ms·
MOF is only "simple" because it is lower level than UML proper. A lot of "not quite the same" would come to light if two different people attempted to rebuild t
by HelloNurse 1y ago
MOF is only "simple" because it is lower level than UML proper. A lot of "not quite the same" would come to light if two different people attempted to rebuild the respective UML subsets they care about.
- PaulHoule 1y agoI'm sure of it. I worked on a project to turn a MOF-based representation of the ISO 20022 standard to RDF (as well as being able to write the messages in RDF) and I wrote some tooling to do it, looking at the specs it seemed it should have been possible to bootstrap a UML 2 system using the same approach but I saw enough strange discontinuities that I didn't go forward, but had I invested two months I probably would have solved the "two Class" problem and made some major progres. But boy have I done some many 2 month projects where I got to the bottom of something like that and bootstrapped a system and then found the world just didn't care... I'd have the most productive 2 months of my career and make $0.00.